How to prepare Sentinel-1 images stack for PSI/SBAS in SNAP 5


#82

Hi krasny2k5,

According to the source code in ps_select.m from line 262~267:

i_min=max(ps_ij(1)-n_win/2, 1);
i_max=i_min+n_win-1;
if i_max > n_i
i_min=i_min-i_max+n_i;
i_max=n_i;
end

The value of i_min or i_max can not be negative if the if statement is not true. However, once the if is true, i_min will equal -n_win+1+n_i, where n_win is the parameter clap_win in step 2, which equals 32 by default, while the value of n_i depends on both the parameter filter_gird_size, which is also the parameter in step 2 and default value is 50 meters, and the size of pixels, which default is 5m20m, so, the minimum of you subset should let n_i(or n_j) equals 31, means it should larger than 3150/5=310 in col and 31*50/20=77.5 in row.

But actually I do not meet the problem as you do, so you should test it by yourself, increase the size of your subset, and maybe the problem can be solved.

Hope this helps,
Fei


#83

Hi Adrian,
Neither do I. I haven’t found out why we couldn’t export the ‘dem’ folder.


#84

Hi Sharon,
I’m very sad to hear that,but I will not give up the attempt.If I have the correct folders,I will tell you.


#85

I will keep trying. And also will tell you if I know what is the problem.


#86

Hi, Sharon

Do you have ever tried to output the elevation band in topo phase removal step?

In this case, you do not need to add elevation band manually.

Hope this helps,
Fei


#87

Hi Fei,
It seems that my SNAP version output the elevation band in topo phase removal step automatically.

So, after that step, I don’t need to add the elevation band and just export to stamps directly. I will try it and tell you if it’s work.
Thank you!


#88

Thank you very much for your detailed explanation FeiLiu.

I extended my zone and it seems to be working now, it seems that the lines wasn´t enough.

Joaquin


#89

Sharon, make sure that you are using latest version of SNAP software, you can check by entering in tools menu -> plugins and clicking on “check for updates”.

In topographic phase removal you should have options to export the elevation band.

Joaquin


#91

Hi krasny2k5,

Yes, I have some update. I will update them and then try it again!
Thank you!


#92

It´s trying to download an old version of the software (snap-rcp-5.0.6 is outdated by 5.0.7). Did you click in “check for updates” to reload the list of packages? If it´s not working I would reinstall SNAP.

Joaquin


#93

I found the problem for updating, and it updates now. Thank you for your help!


#94

Hi all,

I think I have met another tricky problem, here is my result after run stamps(5,5):

I have 13 images(1 master and 12 slaves), I split them into 3 stack(each has 1 master and 4 slaves) and export them separately, after I merge them and process them by StaMPS, I get the result as above(the 12th ifg is the master-master ifg).

The PSs seems right, because the fringe they formed are just like ifgs. However, it is very strange that 1-4 ifgs fringe are similar, 5-8 ifgs fringe are similar, 9-12(except master-master) ifgs fringe are similar, but they are quite different from each other. And the similar ifgs belongs to same stack.

I was thinking it maybe in the interferogram formation step, I have done Substract flat-earth phase, since they belong to different stack, the result might be different.

I tried not to substract flat-earth pahse in interferogram formation, but the result is not good, fringes are too dense. Maybe put all images into one stack can solve this, but it requires very high memory.

Do anyone has an idea or meet the same problem?@katherine@ABraun
Fei


#95

thanks for reporting. Actually, I didn’t get this far yet, I’m still trying to understand the steps before. But I’ll let you know when I’m there.


Topographic Phase removal of S-1 stack for StaMPS export has some problem
Topographic phase removal does not seem to work
#96

Dear @FeiLiu, I met a similar problem: in my case the results of topographic remove tool are wrong.
Have you compared interferograms (after topo remove) in your stack with results of single pairs?


#97

Hi annamaria,

Thank you for your hint, I just do the experiments as you said, you guess right, the stack topo romoval result are different from single pair, but the ifg are same before topo removal, and just like you have described, the topo removal of stack has some problem and I can not get right result. Do you have any progress now?

All the best,
Fei


#98

Dear @FeiLiu, i’m sorry that you have this problem.
I contacted @lveci last week but I haven’t had answer. I haven’t had time to check the source code, expecially beacuse i don’t know java language. I think that this is a big problem for not expert users. @ABraun Have idea about who I can contact?
Anyway, as i wrote in another post, i bypass the problem with the creation of a stack with results of single pairs elaborations (in this case you must rename all images removing “slvx_xxxxxx”, otherwise StaMPS export doesn’t find the correct images).


#99

Hi krasny2k5,

After update and removed topographic phase, I got another error at stamps export as below:


#100

@Sharon you must use “XXX…ifg_deb_dinsar” and “XXX…_deb” (without interferogram).
Are you sure that there are right layers?


#101

You must use the corregistered stack and dinsar product. You are using two stacks of interferograms.

Also you must deburst the corregistered stack before the interferogram formation. So your products should be:

split_orb_pc_stack_deb
split_orb_pc_stack_deb_ifg_dinsar

Hope that this helps you.

Joaquin


#102

Dear annamaria,
Could you please describe your method more specifically? I can not find the post you have written, sorry for troubling you.