I am running SEN2COR for a range of registrations (about 270 observations, time series for one tile, from 2015 to 2018)
I get some results with 6 raster objects [0-5]:
ENVI> print, raster[0].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
B2 B3 B4 B8
ENVI> print, raster[1].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
AOT
ENVI> print, raster[2].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
WVP
ENVI> print, raster[3].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
B5 B6 B7 B8A B11 B12
ENVI> print, raster[4].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
AOT
ENVI> print, raster[5].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
WVP
ENVI> print, raster[6].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
% Attempt to subscript RASTER with <LONG ( 6)> is out of range.
And some with 8 rasterobjects [0-8]:
ENVI> print, raster[0].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
B2 B3 B4 B8
ENVI> print, raster[1].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
AOT
ENVI> print, raster[2].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
WVP
ENVI> print, raster[3].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
B4 B3 B2
ENVI> print, raster[4].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
B5 B6 B7 B8A B11 B12
ENVI> print, raster[5].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
SLC_Classification
ENVI> print, raster[6].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
AOT
ENVI> print, raster[7].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
WVP
ENVI> print, raster[8].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
B4 B3 B2
ENVI> print, raster[9].metadata[‘BAND NAMES’]
% Attempt to subscript RASTER with <LONG ( 9)> is out of range.
Anyway to get consistend (i.e. IDENTICAL) output for a time series of SENTINEL2 L1C data when running SEN2COR?
Does it differ among versions of SEN2COR
Who develop SEN2COR?
Regards
/Jonas Ardö