I’ve found that the BRR reflectances I obtain from SNAP might have still a strong Rayleigh signal. I get this idea (which might not be accurate) by comparing with a home made processor I’ve been working on.
As a first “evidence”, let me show you the blueish foreground I get in the RGB composite from SNAP RC reflectances:
As a second “evidence”, observe that in all pins (last figure) I get a strong blue signal difference which seems to match quite well a Rayleigh reflectance functional type (sort of lambda^-4). Might there be an issue here? Or it’s me that haven’t interpreted thr rBRR magnitude as I should have done?
Yes, I’m using the latest version. I’ve created the BRR product via Optical -> Preprocessing -> Rayleigh-Corrected (or similar) and used the BEAM output.
It’s not possible in BEAM. BEAM does not support OLCI.
SNAP is the successor of BEAM. As said on the entry web page of BEAM, it is not further developed.
So you should SNAP.
We have tested the Rayleigh Correction implemented in SNAP under the Optical/Preprocessing plugin.
The results, using the processing parameter “Compute bottom of Rayleigh reflectance bands”, were highly satisfactory - the selected S-3 OLCI L1 scenes were largely corrected and improved. See an example below for the region of Chile.