I am a SeaDAS 7.5.3 user (Ubuntu 18.04 lts) for MODIS data.
I am extracting 1000 pixels from a list of dim files. Because I have to do more than two hundred extractions, opted to do that trough gpt within a loop for batch processing.
However, I realized that if I PixEx trough GUI from SeaDAS, it generates a file with more than double the size of the file generated from gpt with xml file. I generated the xml file from GUI for comparison but could not detect the difference. I’m affraid my batch processing might be missing something that causing less extraction than I need.
I imported the same file of 1000 points into SeaDAS GUI for PixEx and generated the xml file and attached it here. I copied the dim files into a exclusive folder to make the GUI extraction easier.
The gpt, xml and par files for the batch processing are compacted into one file and attached as well. The other attached file has the 1000 points needed for both methods.
Would you please have a look into my two ways of PixEx? I want to know how to correct the batch processing for PixEx to extract correctly.
Thanks a lot for your help.