Different DN values in same Sentinel-2

Hi all.

We have some doubts about the cause of the differences in DN between tiles corresponding to the same scene in Sentinel-2:

S2A_MSIL2A_20240103T160651_N0510_R097_T16PFS_20240103T212452.SAFE

S2A_MSIL2A_20240103T160651_N0510_R097_T16PFT_20240103T212452.SAFE

We have found that the digital level of a shared pixel of the common area in both images is different, and we don’t know the cause of it (angle of solar incidence, etc). I would be very grateful if someone could tell us if some kind of radiometric (or other) normalization is necessary to mosaic both images.

Best regards and thanks in advance.

The values can be different due to the applied AC. It uses some tile dependent value. Thus, the different values in the overlapping area.

1 Like

The difference is usually not that big. You are looking at 2 different pixels here - different values of X and Y in your screenshot. The differences are much smaller in this case - 3rd decimal place, which should not have a big impact on most applications.

for a bounding box of [646480.0, 1191290.0, 646510.0, 1191300.0]

The corresponding numbers are
[0.2364, 0.2828, 0.2036]
[0.2406, 0.2874, 0.205]

1 Like

Thanks Marco

Thanks @piyushrpt

Yes indeed; the pixels of those images don’t match. Subsequently, I made the comparison for the same pixel and the variability is reduced. I don’t know if this can be useful to anyone, but I did some basic statistics of the average variability in the reflectance (for tropical dry forests and grasslands) and these are the results (bands 4 and 8):

Band 4 Media Median StDeviat Varianz
Dry forest 0,0009 0,001 0,0002 0,00000007
Wet Forest 0,0074 0,0068 0,0026 0,0000072
Grasslands 0,0001 0,00008 0,0001 0,000000012
Medium 0,001 0,00096 0,00139 0,0000019
Band 8 Media Median StDeviat Varianz
Dry forest 0,00085 0,0004 0,001 0,000001
Wet Forest 0,042 0,02 0,05 0,002
Grasslands 0,00088 0,0005 0,00084 0,0000007
Medium 0,0023 0,0005 0,0129 0,000168

Band 8 (left) and Band 4 (right)

open for discussion :wink: