@qglaude Thank you so much. I need to have an amplitude to do the following analysis based on the suggested references by Prof. Fielding.
Yes, I know. I generated the amplitude using Intensity and band math in SNAP, after applying TOPSAR-Split and Apply-Orbit-File for both two images. I need to coregister or match two amplitude products in any way to do that analysis.
@ABraun I don’t know. I am reading this reference now.
Michel, R., J.-P. Avouac, and J. Taboury (1999), Measuring ground displacements from SAR amplitude images: Application to the Landers earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 875 – 878.
Whenever I get the result and knowledge about this topic, I will share here with you. I found this paper and that technique interesting
@ABraun Thank you so much. I will try all ways and share the results here. As the last question, this tool is only for S1 satellite or we can use for others like Envisat?
It is possible to make SNAP use your SLC images but the module is designed for GRD in input. Personal tests (Offset Tracking : SLC vs GRDH products) makes me very skeptical about using SLC images in SNAP.
Just for info : The way the module is implemented in SNAP will not allow you to detect very fine displacements. Pixel Offset in SNAP is good for glacier displacement, for sure, but I can’t guaranty it will work for earthquake
I read the tutorial for Offset Tracking using GRDH product of S1 and also, saw the video of RUS service about Glacier Velocity With Sentinel-1. In RUS video, the scientist chose HH polarization for calibration and thermal noise removal steps but my downloaded S1 images have only VV and VH polarizations. So, I am worried about this dataset is suitable to process in this way or not?!
It does not really matter if your polarisation over land is VV for HH, but HH is definitely better for glaciers. It will be interesting to see if offset tracking works for (huge) earthquake displacements.
@ABraun Yes. I would like to test this tool with a different suitable setting for earthquake and get the results and see maybe I can get the reasonable ones. I don’t know I only need to try
In case you used SRTM 3Sec for coregistration, try switching to SRTM 1Sec, because problems were lately reported with the first one. When the coregistation fails, the subsequent steps are obsolete. But it is hard to check which step in the graph cause the error. So it would maybe help to prepare the data until “Subset” and make sure it is correct and then apply different settings of the Offset Tracking tool on it.
@ABraun Thank you so much. I am doing your suggestion to check step by step. I need to tell you that I also applied Thermal Noise Removal and Calibration steps before doing this graph based on RUS service webinar. I read the SNAP tutorial and help about these steps and found them useful for GRDH products but I don’t know they are special for glacier environment and application or not?!