Dear @Will, I cant’t open the link about SBAS proccessing of GMTSAR in this post. Could you please send it me again. Thanks very much.
I am very interested in test your method SBAS with SNAP+STaMPS, can I join you? I have used SNAP+STaMPS for PS in urban area, the result (velocity)seems small than other people’s result.
All the best,
Hello Fei Liu
I am not certain of my qualification. I did execute a similar task in 4 quadrants. I executed a solve via weighted string values.
Those values via ubuntu. Hence to ML lawn. Is that similar to what you are testing.?
I’m interested in helping out with testing SBAS method. Just recently got succeed in getting the PS SNAP>StaMPS workflow thanks to all help and posts by @FeiLiu , @Katherine , @ABraun, @thho and others here. Since the area being studies is mostly rural with small patches of human made features and the number of available image products is low (Due to seasonal ground cover less than 12 Sentinel images and due to $$$ less than 6 TerraSAR-X images.) the SBAS seems of possible use.
is there any tutorials about PS SNAP->StaMPS?i need it
can you give me some advice about SNAP+StaMPS,i want to practice。
Please go through the links provided here: About the STaMPS category
If your question is still unanswered, you find the perpendicular baseline in the InSAR stack tool. You may need to activate the Radar Tools in the toolbar.
Just select a coregistered product and then click on the tool. Any product (also later stages, such as interferograms) should be possible.
yup found it, thank you @ABraun
I am also interested in testing this new method. I am currently using SNAP & STAMPS for PS.
Hello dear @FeiLiu
I am very interested to test SBAS method, can ı try it too ?
ı am already using SNAP-StaMPS v3.b1(PSI) workflow
I am interested to test your SBAS method. I am already testing the concept of SBAS method with snap. I have a good experience with snap-stamps-isce-doris-adore, I think I can help you to build a smooth operation for the SBAS method.
Thank you for your thoughts.
I used SNAP and Stamps for some PS process and the results are fine.
I try to modify the dim file and its associated data file to fit the SBAS process, but I dont think it is a good way. I can do some coding, and I would love to join this test.
All the best,
Is there any update on how the testing is going? I am also interested in testing SBAS through StaMPS.
I am interested in testing SBAS method. I have used SNAP and StaMPS for PS processing in landslide and subsidence arae.
Hope I could join this test.
I have just created an account here and have seen your topic, although it has been a long time. I used to work with PSI with SNAP and STaMPS with Sentinel-1 images. Now, I would like to try with the SBAS method by using Sentinel combining Snap and STaMPS. Please guide me. My email firstname.lastname@example.org
Fei Liu has not been active in this forum since a longer time.
Currently, SNAP does not support multi-master approaches, such as SBAS, but this is planned for upcoming versions.
Thank you for your reply. I will wait for new updates from SNAP.
Sorry to all for my long leave. Too many things have happened to me during this time. The test is now stopped and for people who want to apply SBAS my recommandation is using ISCE: https://winsar.unavco.org/software/isce.
All the best, Fei.