Andreas, thanks for the comparison. Indeed the terrain flattening should replace the radiometric normalization. The normalization has been there since NEST. I’m not sure if there is any advantage to leave in the software multiple ways of doing similar things with new methods added in over time. I suppose each user could determine which works best for their particular scenario and data.
However, if something is clearly replaced by a better method then we should remove the obsolete method.
1 Like