S2A vs S2B Biophysical Processor

[mattfriesen]

I am processing both S2A and S2B data using the biophysical processor in SNAP; however when switching to S2B products, the processor is very slow and I am not certain it is even processing at this point. I am wondering: what are the differences between the S2A and S2B processor? The S2A products work well when running through the processor, and the S2B products work when running through the S2A processor as well, but the S2B parameter is very slow or stalled, and I am wondering why, or what the differences between the S2A and S2B parameter within the biophysical processor are?

[gnwiii]

Before posting, please search the forums. You would have found:

Sensor Characteristics in Biophysical Processor - SNAP 8.0

Hi @atewesk, I do not have the exact number (I will try to find some number in the next days) however the spectral responses of the S2A and S2B satellites have some differences as you can see in the graph below and the previous model was tuned only on the S2A sensors (the S2B data were not yet available when the previous version of the algorithm has been developed). [SpectralResponse] I will let you know more details about the improvement in the next days. Cheers, Martino