Hi,
We all know that In order to have a good comparison between two things, they should be comparable.
I started looking at two S1A-IW-GRD products which are taken from the same location in the temporal distance of 12 days (They are both in ascending mode).
Observations:
-
the two tiles (lets call them Master and Slave) do not have the same number of rows and/or columns:
Master (X,Y) = (25979, 16694)
Slave (X,Y) = (25978, 16695) -
I used GDAL to see the information regarding the GCPs of the same GCPs belonging to each tile:
(north-west) pixels
Master 1 (0.00P,0.00L) -> (5.8071029E,45.4207633N,1353.21)
SLave 1 (0.00P,0.00L) -> (5.8073678E,45.4208335N,1353.21)
(north-east) pixels
Master 21 (25978.00P,0.00L) -> (9.0883795E,45.8208640N,1353.29)
Slave 21 (25977.00P,0.00L) -> (9.0885275E,45.8208917N,1353.29)
(south-west) pixels
Master 190 (0.00P,16693.00L) -> (5.3597872E,46.9157973N,497.42)
Slave 190 (0.00P,16694.00L) -> (5.3602404E,46.9159847N,506.19)
(south-east) pixels
Master 210 (25978.00P,16693.00L) -> (8.7320729E,47.3168078N,497.41)
Slave 210 (25977.00P,16694.00L) -> (8.7324286E,47.3169477N,506.18)
One can see differences of coordinate values between the counterpart GCP couples of each tile.
Question
For this inconsistency can I do Geocoding on Master and Slave images individually in order to ameliorate this differences between the two data before applying co-registration?
Thanks for any comments on this
Sina