I do not know the answer to your question because I am really new and inexperienced in this work 
. . I intend to get an acceptable output from these processes and submit them for my doctoral dissertation. So far, I have learned from this association. Can you tell me all the codes I need and you in my article that you linked to me? Thank you
Especially when you are less experienced you should not just follow guidelines and trust the result. One crucial aspect for every DInSAR analysis is gaining knowledge on the error sources and getting a feeling about the reliability of the results.
It makes little sense to apply scripts without knowing what they do. In a doctoral dissertation you proof to others that you can develop ideas, understand and apply methods of others, and test hypotheses based on your own analyses.
Have a look at the results - do they make sense? What’s the amount of noise for the different areas. The time-series plot indicates well how noisy the data is. Compared to the time-series of the linked study, your plot looks much more linear and less noisy. If this is the same case for the others, you can start interpreting the results.
Dear ABraun, thank you very much for your excellent answer. How do I know how low the noise is in similar cases?How can I create the following histograms and Box plots for every part?thanks
I exported the PS as kml file as described in the StaMPS manual, imported them into QGIS and intersected them with polygons, dividing them into island and mainland, and also extracting them from the different locations (A-E). I then exported the intersected points as CSV and created the boxplots in Python.
Can you say me more easily about the S1-TOPSAR-Merge in snap2stamps?
Hi all.
I am getting the following problem when applying the code coreg_ifg_topsar.py
Serco Italia SPA (2020). SNAP2StaMPS: Data preparation for StaMPS PSI processing with SNAP -
Mexico City 2020 (version 1.1). Retrieved from RUS Lectures at https://ruscopernicus.eu/portal/the-rus-library/learn-by-yourself/
I am working on SNAP v. 8.0
Can someone help me, please?
snap2stamps is ready to work with SNAP (v6.0), a bit old, but one day it will be updated.
As you claim to be using SNAP 8, my main question is… had you prepared/modified the needed lines on the coreg_ifg graph used?
Not sure if you get something from SERCO or from the snap2stamps github repository or zenodo package.
More info = more help
2 Likes
The ESD operator got an update already in SNAP 7, so the graph xml is slightly different.
I invite you to search in the forum as the solution is somewhere indicated.
Do you refer to UseSuppliedRange/AzimuthShift or also other parms?
Hi, dear mdelgado…is there a relation between the Kubuntu version and snap2stamps workflow scripts runing?
Hi, dear ABraun…when I set IW in the config file of snap2stamps workflow to IW1, I get this error! what is the reason for that?? it is worth mentioning when I work on IW2 and IW3 subswathes everything is ok.
I solved this problem by changing the parameter of IW1 into IWs in the config file and all scripts
1 Like
Dear All, I have used snap2stamps many times with success (Ubuntu 16.04). After I take a break of 9 months I returned and found that the final step (stamps_export) did not complete. I read somewhere here on the forum that I need to upgrade to SNAP v8, but this did not work (even splitting_slaves.py failed). So I returned back to SNAP v6 and now I have the following error in the coreg_ifg_topsar.
Can anyone suggest how to fix this?
Just jnstall libgfortran3
Thanks but libgfortran3 is already installed so that is not the issue.
But it is showing libgfortran-4.so error. Better try to install libgfortran4.