well, the results are the deformation speed. After step 7 you are finished and can use the various plotting options to extract the type of deformation you need (examples on this: http://seom.esa.int/landtraining2015/files/Day_4/D4P2a_LTC2015_Hooper.pdf)
You can also use the viStaMPS tool to convert it to a kmz file: http://vistamps.utad.pt/
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82617832.pdf
I think you are specifically looking for the formula for vertical diaplacemenr from LOS displacemnt output from StaMPS. Since you are doing research on a landslide you cant assume inly vertical displacement and will have to vectorize the LOS displacements into 3d using both ascending and deacending track. Take a look at some papers on this topic by seatching for 3d diaplacement InSAR ascending descending keywords. Some explanation is alao on this forum.
yes i just need the formula
as i mentioned, since you are doing 3d displacement i cant give it to you, i have never used it before. but as i suggested, search some papers on the topic, it will make it clear. you can use the data from the csv to compute it. for example check the paper of @mdelgado about 3D displacement in the city of Rome.
i have a query…
After TOPS Split i ran a series of process to obtain the interferogram. And now, while debursting, it takes more than 24 hours and even the process stopped incomplete (system shut down itself). So, i thought of subsetting the interferogram image and then deburst (Which also brings out an error).
So, is it that we shouldnt subset the image before debursting?
Or, is there any feasible solution?
@thho @falahfakhri @ABraun
The reason why deburst should be applied before subset, is mentioned in here,
But the solution of processing the whole image is to process each subswath separately and then merge all together, please take a look at the following post,
TOPSAR merge Source of the post
another doubt,
Once an image is split, y cant i split it further? Instead i am only able to split from the source image only…
Is there a reason for it or any other possible way available?
Would you please to clarify this, because according to my understanding, I’ll comeback to the previous post and re-answer the same , since the S-1 has three sub-swaths each one consists number of bursts, so the easiest way to the low computer capacity in case of the whole image is the goal of AOI, is to split the each sub-swath separately and then merge all together once the processing is done.
But, in case you split the image for let’s say to four bursts, and you’re interested in the specific AOI, within this splited bursts, so you could apply subset in this case and then continue the processing,
What i mean is that, i have only the split image now, which has 7 bursts. Now from this image i cudnt split further… Is that feasible i wonder…?
No, you could split further as I mentioned in my previous post, once you have 7 bursts of one sub-swath you could split them to get only one or more bursts less than 7 according to your demand, using this bar
This is my image, i have already split once… so i have a split image with 7 bursts and while i further split with the splitted image i get such an error…
This is from the original image right?? i have done this only and have got a split image of 7 bursts… My doubt is that y i cant further split from the split image rather than the original image…?
Yes,
But why you replicate the same process two times, you could do all at once, as I explained in my example,
From the error you get, I guess this operator is working only with multi sub-swath, to get splited the image to single burst, or multi bursts,
Yes i do understand that, the thing is i dont have my original image and i have only the split image. So i thought of sorting a way to subset or split the split image further, so that i could reduce some time…
But i find now that it is not possible without the original image…
Download again the original image, and if it’s offline you could order it again,
yes… that is the only option left with now… Thank you…
to calculate the vertical displacement, should be used the local incidence angle or the angle of incidence from the ellipsoid ?
Hi everyone 
I have finished Stamps (8,8).
But before I visualize the results, I want to limit the area that will be displayed, how to do it?
What command should I use? and would you give an example of the number coordinate format entered in the command?
Thanks in advance 
This should be done in earlier steps in SNAP, By subsetting the AOI,
