Hi everyone, I have been using SNAP ESA since the year began. I would like to know if my results are ok or at leats look good before unwrapping. The study area is from Bogotá, Colomba. I used a DEM 12*12 meters. I am also going to use the land/sea mask for reducing de areas with low coherence for a better unwrapping process.
In addittion I have some questions:
- If I use two images with two or three months betwen them, Will the results be ok if the area is urban?
- If I change the pixel expression of an Interferrogram phase, and only choose those which the coherence is higher than 0.6, Will the unwrapping process and the results be better?
- Do you thnink that the SRTM 1SEC could give good results for my study area? I really apreciate some help.
The coherence looks good over the study area but the interferograms have weird patterns, maybe related to ionospheric phase.
What’s the aim of your study?
Thanks for your answer Mr. I major in Geology and for my thesis I want to measure land subsidence in Bogotá City, Colombia. (A tropical country)
I have read other studies in the same area and they show subsidence specially in the center part of the city, but they have used another software and different data (like terrasar-x or ENVIASAT)for getting their results.
In my case, it’s my first time using SNAP and I would like to do the same using Sentinel-1 products.
What would you recommend me?
Much depends on the selection of suitable image pairs (short temporal baseline, small perpendicular baseline, no rainfall during both acquisitions, low vegetation cover…)
Also, it is good to compute several products and compare the results. Masking low coherence could help in your area as you can only determine inner urban variations.
These summaries are also quite helpful: InSAR Principles: Guidelines for SAR Interferometry Processing and Interpretation (ESA TM-19)
Hi Mr ABraun, thank you so much for your comments. I also have some questions and comments.
- All images I selected have the same relative orbit, were acquired in the dry season and have two or one month between them.
- I have read that in urban areas there’s not problem with long time ( at least three or two months) because these areas have high coherence.
- If I mask the low coherence areas ( <0.6) with the pixel expression before unwrapping, then If I unwrapping this product will the results improve?
- If I use a polygon that only cover my study area, then Will the results in the unwrapping process would be better?
Thanks for your help Sir.
I’m also planning to do this study from 2016 to 2020. But I’m trying first with these years (2016-2017).
This is one example below. It was made with TerraSar-x data and with other software different to SNAP. This interferogram was made by the Geological Service of my country.
Masking is most effective if there are low coherence areas in between high coherence areas. Masking causes that random phase in these areas will not add up to strange patterns.But as you are only interested in the inside of the cities, the effect of masking is smaller, but it’s probably still helpful.
You already cropped the image product to the smallest extent possible so the impact of low coherence are is already minimized. Additional masking (with a polygon) will probably have no effect.
Finding the best image pairs is probably your most effective challenge. If your study area is covered here, you can get quicklooks of the interferograms in this portal: https://comet.nerc.ac.uk/comet-lics-portal/
Thanks for your answer Mr, I am going to check the link. : )
Be aware that the “ALOS PALSAR DEM” was derived from open-source, existing DEMs and is not generated from ALOS PALSAR imagery and is not 12.5m resolution.
Information on the source DEMs and how they were used in creating the ALOS PALSAR radiometrically terrain corrected (RTC) products can be viewed on the Alaska Satellite Facility website:
this is absolutely true for the ALOS PALSAR RTC products, but it does not apply for DEMs generated from image pairs of ALOS by interferometry.
Hi Mr Braun. I have been using your recommendations and I am still trying to solve the problems with the interfwerograms. Also, thank you all who have helped me.
Mr I have a question related to COMET-LiCS Sentinel-1 InSAR portal, What means “max network length” and “Epochs processed” in the main page?
Thanks for your answer.
these describe the overall duration which can be covered by the processed interferograms, because their processing is still ongoing. Depending on where you are on Earth, you might have time series of 2, 4 or even 6 years.
Thank you for the explanation Mr.
Mr sorry for my questions, however I have one last question. I have explored the COMET-LICs data. I already downloaded some of the data of my interest area. The data have information of the coherence, wrapped phase and unwrapped phase, and all of them are in .tiff as well. May I process those data using SNAP in that format?
Here are the information into the interferograms folder.
Thank you so much for your help.
Unfortunately, SNAP can read them, but they don’t have the necessary metadata for further processing in SNAP. The scripts of LiCSBAS can handle this format, but you have to follow the instructions of the manual.
I really thank you Mr for your fast answer and recommendations.
Hi Sir, I hope you find well. Finally I have changed my study area and I did those displacement maps from January 2020 to December 2020. However, when I try to do an average map of the displacement maps SNAP show me that error.
Displacement maps 01 2020 to 04 2020
Displacement maps 05 2020 to 08 2020
Displacement maps 09 2020 to 12 2020
What do you recommend me? I really apreciate your help.
have you tried to compute the average of two displacements at first for a test?
Actually not, Im going to try and then come back with the results. Thanks.