As previously written, the anomaly impacting R079_V20160403T095406_20160403T095406 (T33UXP) and more generally the whole orbit A4080, R079, is still under investigation. Note that another orbit is impacted by a similar behaviour that is A3218, R075.
The associated products should have been removed from SciHub.
Sorry, I did not pay attention to your comment:“Another image, like the more recent
correctly georeferenced (sorry, being new, I cannot insert more than 1
It means that there is still an older version of the same product available somewhere, should be removed to my opinion… From where did you get them? SciHub? Another portal?
I can see that the products you wanted to mosaic were not from the same relative orbit (50 and 93), which means that the geometric conditions are not similar.
Moreover, a slight yaw drift existed within the swath that as been corrected end of May.