I have a similar problem with the post of yours in terms of interferogram averaging and I would like some suggestions because I am still confused.
I have crated an interferogram (for the period between March of 2016 and March of 2017) to find a potential subsidence for my area of interest but it suffers from decorellation and some artifacts due to the atmosphere. So, I downloaded 10 SLC SENTINEL1 images and I am about to produce a series of interferograms and average them out so I can hopefully increase the coherence in the area and reduce the atmospheric effect.
I am thinking of two ways of producing the interferograms and doing the averaging but I do not know which method is the
interferogram combinations: 1(master) - 2(slave), 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 1-6, 1-7, 1-8, 1-9, 1-10
interferogram combination: 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, 5-6, 6-7, 7-8, 8-9, 9-10
In the first method, we have one master and the other images are slaves and in the second method we have different master images.
So, my question is, which method is the ‘best’ or the most preferable one?
@ABraun , you mentioned in your post above that only the method of one master and mane slaves is possible in SNAP. So, the method with different master images does not work ?